华人生死学
不同年龄组民众对“生前预嘱”的认知和行为倾向 ——基于444份生前预嘱问卷的调研

General public"s cognition and behavioral tendencies toward living wills: Focusing on age differences
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 调查不同年龄组民众对生前预嘱的实际认知和行为倾向。方法 在“死亡话语素养”概念基础上,采用自制问卷调查对五个年龄组444名参与者的生前预嘱的实际认知和行为倾向。结果 民众在多方面认同生前预嘱理念,也愿意填写生前预嘱,但总体来说填写生前预嘱的比例还比较低。对生前预嘱的认知和行为倾向均呈现出随年龄增长而增进的趋势,其中中老年组(50-59岁)填写比例和不愿意、不确定的比例均为最高,这种分化现象可以由代际社会学的“社会代”和“生命历程理论”来解释。结论 生前预嘱推广必要且紧迫,可以多渠道多途径开展,特别是加大网络宣传力度,突出填写的促动因素,尤其是不得善终的实际案例,努力提高民众的死亡话语素养。此外,推广也需考虑不同年龄人群的实际特点。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the actual cognition and behavioral tendencies of the general public of different age groups regarding advance directives.Methods Based on the concept of "death literacy," a self-designed questionnaire was used to survey 444 participants from five evenly distributed age groups regarding their cognition and behavioral tendencies related to advance directives.Results The public generally recognizes the concept of advance directives and is willing to complete them, but the overall completion rate remains relatively low. Both the cognition of and behavioral tendencies toward advance directives show an increasing trend with age. Among these, the middle-aged and older group (50-59 years) had the highest completion rate as well as the highest proportion of those unwilling or uncertain, a phenomenon that can be explained by Mannheim"s concept of social generation and Elder"s Life Course.Conclusion Promoting advance directives is necessary and urgent. Efforts should be made through multiple channels and pathways, especially by strengthening online publicity, highlighting motivating factors for completion, such as real-life cases of suffering at the end of life, and striving to improve the public"s death literacy. Additionally, promotion efforts should take into account the characteristics of different age groups.

    参考文献
    [1] 崔静,周玲君,赵继军.生前预嘱的产生和应用现状[J].中华护理杂志,2008 (09):860-861.
    [2] 陆杰华,杨茜茜.我国推动生前预嘱入法的现状、挑战及其未来设想[J].人口与健康,2022(09):18-21.
    [3] 田晴,伍碧,刘俊荣.生前预嘱的研究现状及展望[J].中国医学伦理学,2023,36(02):122-129.
    [4] 王龙,阚凯.生前预嘱的立法问题研究[J].医学与法学,2020,12(03):104-108.
    [5] 丁映轩,王壮,龙艺.(2018).尊重生命——从一份“生前预嘱”开始[J].中国医学伦理学,31(10):1305-1308.
    [6] 余文诗,高云,朱国清,杜金凤,关静仪.“尊严死”还是“赖活着”?——我国生前预嘱的伦理困境分析及对策研究[J].中国医学伦理学,2018,31(06):700-703.
    [7] 王丽英,胡雁,陆箴琦,顾文英.肿瘤科医护人员对晚期肿瘤患者实施预先指示的质性研究[J].医学与哲学(临床决策论坛版),2011,32(11):1-4+22.
    [8] 刘洁明,何丽君,徐思思,卢智贤,陈君.关于预嘱尊严死的认知和接受度调查——以ICU终末期患者家属为例[J].卫生软科学,2018,32(11):67-70.
    [9] 邢冰玉,缪群芳,梁冠冕.肿瘤专科医院护士对生前预嘱认知态度及影响因素调查[J].循证护理,2021,7(15):2087-2091.
    [10] 邢冰玉,缪群芳,李红娟,舒婉,谷柏毅.杭州市居民对生前预嘱的认知现状调查及影响因素分析[J].健康研究,2022,42(02):153-157.
    [11] 章艳婷,钱新毅,李建军.老年病人生前预嘱知信行调查问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理研究,2020,34(23):4154-4158.
    [12] 章艳婷,钱新毅.老年病人生前预嘱知信行现状及影响因素[J].护理研究,2021,35(19):3395-3400.
    [13] 冼婉铃,潘杰,陈露,方志明,陈奕纯,孔维珊,董平萍.大学生对生前预嘱的知信行现状及影响因素分析[J].心理月刊,2023,18(11):197-201.
    [14] 张俊贤,常笑.农村老年人生前预嘱知信行现状及影响因素分析[J].全科护理,2023,21(22):3140-3144.
    [15] 罗正鹏,高一虹.走向死亡话语素养[J].医学与哲学,2023,44(08):19-23.
    [16] KIM J,HEO S,HONG Set al.Psychometric Testing of the Korean Version of the Attitudes toward the Advance Directives in Low-Income Chronically Ill Older Adults[J]. Healthcare,2020,8(1):62.https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010062
    [17] Elder Jr G. H.,Shanahan M. J.The Life Course and Human Development[A].In R. M. Lerner (Ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 1).New York: Wiley.
    [18] Pilcher J.Mannheim's sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy[J].British Journal of sociology,1994,481-495.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

田剪秋.不同年龄组民众对“生前预嘱”的认知和行为倾向 ——基于444份生前预嘱问卷的调研[J].华人生死学,2024,(2):50-62

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:80
  • 下载次数: 314
  • HTML阅读次数: 118
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-08
  • 最后修改日期:2024-11-10
  • 录用日期:2024-11-12
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-31
  • 出版日期: 2024-12-05
责编
  • 兰霞萍